Your idea: Style: Directional Best for: Strong trend days Risk: Defined Setup…
One-time — gone on refresh. Copy it and paste as a YouTube comment.
Verdict
Real option-buying backtest. Decoded entry: an opening-range breakout on NIFTY 10-min bars → buy the ATM weekly CE (long) / PE (short), stop 35% / target 65% of premium, square-off by 15:15. Priced on real 1-minute NIFTY option premiums (GFDL, 2015–2026 — every tick of theta, IV crush and gamma is inside these prices), real charges and spread.
1,945 trades on ₹1L: net -325.1% over 12 years (-27.1%/yr, loses money), win 39%, payoff 1.35 (avg win ₹3,036 / avg loss ₹-2,257), max drawdown -348%, worst trade ₹-12,141. 2015: ₹-10,580. 2016: ₹-31,021. 2017: ₹-33,174. 2018: ₹-5,448. 2019: ₹+1,389. 2020: ₹-1,579. 2021: ₹-63,849. 2022: ₹-23,875. 2023: ₹-87,821. 2024: ₹+60,244. 2025: ₹-61,970. 2026: ₹-67,417.
Option buying is convex — low win-rates are normal; the question is whether winners outrun the premium bleed. Backtested on 12 years of minute-level premium data (2015–2026; monthly contracts before 2019 — weeklies didn't exist; constant 65-unit lot); entries tested intraday as taught. Flagged for human review.
Is it profitable? (green above the line = made money, red below = lost it)
Year by year (every trade the rules fired, on real NIFTY option premiums — 1 lot, ₹1L)
| Year | Trades | Win % | Net P&L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 67 | 42% | ₹-10,580 |
| 2016 | 126 | 40% | ₹-31,021 |
| 2017 | 153 | 37% | ₹-33,174 |
| 2018 | 146 | 43% | ₹-5,448 |
| 2019 | 148 | 42% | ₹+1,389 |
| 2020 | 164 | 42% | ₹-1,579 |
| 2021 | 247 | 36% | ₹-63,849 |
| 2022 | 194 | 44% | ₹-23,875 |
| 2023 | 190 | 33% | ₹-87,821 |
| 2024 | 160 | 41% | ₹+60,244 |
| 2025 | 244 | 39% | ₹-61,970 |
| 2026 | 106 | 40% | ₹-67,417 |
Full transcript (85 words)
💬 Trader reviews (traded this? tell others what really happened)
No reviews yet — be the first. Real experiences help other traders more than any backtest.
User opinions, not investment advice. Reviews are moderated before publishing.