Your idea: for nifty 50. when the first one min candle forms measure the 50% le…
One-time — gone on refresh. Copy it and paste as a YouTube comment.
Verdict
Real option-buying backtest. Decoded entry: an opening-range breakout on NIFTY 10-min bars → buy the ATM weekly CE (long) / PE (short), stop 2% / target 4% of premium, square-off by 15:15. Priced on real 1-minute NIFTY option premiums (GFDL, 2015–2026 — every tick of theta, IV crush and gamma is inside these prices), real charges and spread.
1,945 trades on ₹1L: net -286.4% over 12 years (-23.9%/yr, loses money), win 18%, payoff 1.09 (avg win ₹255 / avg loss ₹-233), max drawdown -287%, worst trade ₹-835. 2015: ₹-4,354. 2016: ₹-11,477. 2017: ₹-13,811. 2018: ₹-13,591. 2019: ₹-13,172. 2020: ₹-28,953. 2021: ₹-36,090. 2022: ₹-32,294. 2023: ₹-28,790. 2024: ₹-33,174. 2025: ₹-45,716. 2026: ₹-25,014.
Option buying is convex — low win-rates are normal; the question is whether winners outrun the premium bleed. Backtested on 12 years of minute-level premium data (2015–2026; monthly contracts before 2019 — weeklies didn't exist; constant 65-unit lot); entries tested intraday as taught. Flagged for human review.
Is it profitable? (green above the line = made money, red below = lost it)
Year by year (every trade the rules fired, on real NIFTY option premiums — 1 lot, ₹1L)
| Year | Trades | Win % | Net P&L |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 67 | 34% | ₹-4,354 |
| 2016 | 126 | 24% | ₹-11,477 |
| 2017 | 153 | 24% | ₹-13,811 |
| 2018 | 146 | 26% | ₹-13,591 |
| 2019 | 148 | 25% | ₹-13,172 |
| 2020 | 164 | 13% | ₹-28,953 |
| 2021 | 247 | 18% | ₹-36,090 |
| 2022 | 194 | 15% | ₹-32,294 |
| 2023 | 190 | 9% | ₹-28,790 |
| 2024 | 160 | 10% | ₹-33,174 |
| 2025 | 244 | 14% | ₹-45,716 |
| 2026 | 106 | 14% | ₹-25,014 |
Full transcript (87 words)
💬 Trader reviews (traded this? tell others what really happened)
No reviews yet — be the first. Real experiences help other traders more than any backtest.
User opinions, not investment advice. Reviews are moderated before publishing.