How to Day Trade S&P500 Futures, Forex and Bitcoin Using The Opening Range Breakout (Backtested)
One-time — gone on refresh. Copy it and paste as a YouTube comment.
Why 4.0/5? (stars grade the EDGE — per-trade expectancy, consistency, drawdown — not the headline return)
- ✓ Strong per-trade edge: +0.36R expectancy across 13,425 trades
- ✓ Convex payoff 3.3 — winners far bigger than losers
- ✕ Only 32% of trades win — the rare big winners must keep showing up
- ✕ 5 of 9 tested years were negative (2018, 2019, 2022, 2025) — the edge is regime-dependent
- ✕ Max drawdown -32% on the ₹2L portfolio — the compounded return came with deep pain along the way
Detected components (auto-read from transcript)
Claims it makes (quotes pulled from the transcript)
- “candle so if we find that here I can then Mark the high and the low which then defines my opening range I wait for price to break through the upper line so this”
- “so that's our range candle after that broke through and closed above so the entry signal was right here and then it carried on to a take profit over here so thi”
- “5% draw down of 23 the win rate is slightly improved but the average risk to reward now is 1.”
- “5 it doesn't always get to that because the trades are just stopped at the end of the day this means that the preferred option is to hold the trades for as long”
Verdict
Auto-backtested. Detected: breakout of a recent high. Ran on 159 large/mid-caps, real costs. 13,425 trades, win 32%, payoff 3.25, expectancy +0.36R/trade (avg +1.84%/trade).
This is a real edge. The payoff is convex (winners run well past the average loser). Regime-dependent — positive in only 44% of years.
Mechanically decoded from the transcript and scored from the metrics. Flagged for human review; a hand-vetted verdict can override it.
🔴 Live forward test (no hindsight — only trades the rules fired AFTER we published this verdict)
Tracking since 2026-07-08 — no qualifying signals have fired yet. The engine re-checks every night on fresh data; results appear here the day the rules trigger.
Is it profitable? (green above the line = made money, red below = lost it)
₹2,00,000 portfolio (max 5 positions, across the stock universe — real delivery costs)
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1% | +1% | +33% | +29% | -9% | +16% | +3% | -11% | -11% |
Simulated on the 159 large/mid-cap universe. Capital-constrained, daily mark-to-market.
Year by year (every trade the rules fired, across the tested stocks)
| Year | Trades | Win % | Expectancy | Avg return / trade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 657 | 16% | -0.59R | -3.78% |
| 2019 | 1314 | 27% | -0.02R | -0.01% |
| 2020 | 1817 | 44% | +0.99R | +7.31% |
| 2021 | 1801 | 35% | +0.44R | +2.56% |
| 2022 | 1664 | 26% | -0.07R | -0.74% |
| 2023 | 2119 | 44% | +1.32R | +5.57% |
| 2024 | 1835 | 27% | +0.13R | +0.34% |
| 2025 | 1504 | 29% | -0.02R | -0.39% |
| 2026 | 714 | 22% | -0.36R | -1.72% |
Where this strategy made & lost money (the full stock-by-stock breakdown — 158 stocks, incl. 2026)
| # | Stock | Trades | Win% | Avg/trade | Best | Total | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ████████ | 82 | 51% | +25.3% | +181% | +2077% | +198% |
| 2 | ████████ | 99 | 51% | +19.0% | +124% | +1880% | +159% |
| 3 | ████████ | 76 | 33% | +3.6% | +52% | +277% | +143% |
| 4 | ████████ | 78 | 42% | +6.4% | +85% | +500% | +137% |
| 5 | ████████ | 75 | 41% | +9.0% | +125% | +672% | +75% |
| 6 | ████████ | 69 | 36% | +3.6% | +101% | +246% | +71% |
| 7 | ████████ | 95 | 34% | +2.6% | +68% | +246% | +64% |
| 8 | CUMMINSIND free peek | 106 | 43% | +6.8% | +61% | +717% | +51% |
| 9 | ████████ | 94 | 40% | +4.1% | +66% | +383% | +40% |
| 10 | ████████ | 48 | 38% | +4.1% | +55% | +198% | +29% |
| 11 | ████████ | 102 | 34% | +4.0% | +65% | +406% | +27% |
| 12 | ████████ | 98 | 46% | +7.5% | +59% | +738% | +23% |
| 13 | ████████ | 111 | 34% | +0.8% | +32% | +86% | +19% |
| 14 | ████████ | 103 | 37% | +3.2% | +61% | +332% | +3% |
| 15 | ████████ | 81 | 36% | -0.6% | +15% | -46% | +1% |
| 16 | ████████ | 93 | 31% | +3.1% | +61% | +293% | +0% |
| 17 | ████████ | 92 | 39% | +2.1% | +32% | +194% | +0% |
| 18 | ████████ | 83 | 33% | +2.0% | +46% | +170% | +0% |
| 19 | ████████ | 100 | 31% | +1.7% | +50% | +170% | +0% |
| 20 | ████████ | 80 | 34% | +0.2% | +36% | +19% | +0% |
| 21 | ████████ | 70 | 27% | +2.1% | +60% | +150% | -46% |
| 22 | ████████ | 97 | 31% | +2.8% | +106% | +269% | -45% |
| 23 | ████████ | 89 | 21% | -1.1% | +34% | -96% | -40% |
| 24 | ████████ | 85 | 28% | -0.0% | +32% | -3% | -40% |
| 25 | ████████ | 108 | 30% | +1.4% | +69% | +151% | -37% |
| 26 | ████████ | 70 | 23% | +0.1% | +107% | +7% | -36% |
| 27 | ████████ | 95 | 20% | -1.6% | +33% | -149% | -35% |
| 28 | ████████ | 93 | 39% | +1.2% | +29% | +115% | -34% |
| 29 | ████████ | 90 | 33% | +2.3% | +69% | +205% | -34% |
| 30 | ████████ | 104 | 31% | +2.2% | +81% | +232% | -34% |
Educational backtest output only — not investment advice or a recommendation to buy/sell any security. AI-generated from stored historical data; not 100% accurate. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
On the index (same rules applied to NIFTY & BANKNIFTY)
| Index | Trades | Win% | Expectancy (R/trade) | Avg return/trade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIFTY | 174 | 32% | +0.04R | -0.09% |
| BANKNIFTY | 160 | 32% | +0.20R | +0.54% |
Full transcript (2317 words)
💬 Trader reviews (traded this? tell others what really happened)
No reviews yet — be the first. Real experiences help other traders more than any backtest.
User opinions, not investment advice. Reviews are moderated before publishing.